Lessons from early implementation of the OECD’s Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) in primary care: making the case for co-development and adaptation to national contexts (PERSPECTIVE)

Lessons from early implementation of the OECD’s Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) in primary care: making the case for co-development and adaptation to national contexts (PERSPECTIVE)

co-development, patient-reported indicators, primary care, quality of care, health policy

Data from patient-reported measures, which are reported
directly by the patient without interpretation by a clinician or
anyone else, play a crucial role in the transition toward more
people-centred health systems, that is, systems that are organized around peoples’ needs rather than around what health
services can offer [1]. Such patient-reported data provide useful guidance by informing policymakers about how patients
experience care and whether health care is improving their
health in terms of outcomes that matter to them. Ageing of
populations and rising share of people who live with chronic
conditions have made the availability of such data even more
urgent [2–4]. In spite of this, standardized attempts to measure and compare patient-reported outcome and experience
measures (PROMs and PREMs) internationally are still scarce [5].

Candan Kendir, , Michael van den Berg, Frederico Guanais , Jose M. Valderas, and Niek Klazinga

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ijcoms/lyad003

Oxford University Press

28 April 2023

Sri Wahyuni

PDF

English

Text