The impact of clinical pharmacists’ medication reconciliation upon patients’ admission to reduce medication discrepancies in the emergency department: a prospective quasi‐interventional study
Dublin Core
Title
The impact of clinical pharmacists’ medication reconciliation upon patients’ admission to reduce medication discrepancies in the emergency department: a prospective quasi‐interventional study
Subject
Medication reconciliation, Clinical pharmacist, Medication errors, Drug history list, Patient admission
Description
Background The role of the clinical pharmacist in medication reconciliation is well established. Upon patients’ admis-
sion, the reconciliation service mainly focuses on achieving an accurate and full drug history. This will achieve the best
treatment plan and reduce medication discrepancies.
Upon the recent implementation of clinical pharmacy services in the emergency department at Alexandria Main
University Hospital, medication reconciliation was one of the most important duties that needed to be focused on.
We hypothesized that clinical pharmacists are able to achieve patients’ drug history lists with higher accuracy
than emergency physicians.
Results A total number of 161 patients were included. Age was 58.59±(13.78) years, number of comorbidities
was 2.39±(1.22) and number of home medications was 4.51±(2.72). Clinical pharmacists’ fulfillment of patients’
drug history was significantly more accurate than the emergency physicians (75.16% and 50.3% of the total number
of revised patients’ profiles respectively). The clinical pharmacists could put a written copy of the accurate patients’
drug history list in only 50.93% of the revised patients’ profiles. Five hundred eighty-five medication discrepan-
cies were detected which represent an average of 3.63 discrepancies/medication sheet. Medications at Transitions
and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) Toolkit for medication reconciliation and the National Coordinating Council for Medica-
tion Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) index were used to categorize discrepancies. Categories A, B, and C
represented (66.5%), while categories D, E, and F represented (33.5%) of the total discrepancies. There was a significant
direct relationship between the total number of discrepancies and both the number of comorbidities and the num-
ber of drugs administered before hospital admission.
Conclusion The clinical pharmacists are the main members of the emergency health care team. One of their funda-
mental services is medication reconciliation. The establishment of a complete drug history list and physicians’ discus-
sion about the current treatment plan can obviously detect and reduce medication errors.
sion, the reconciliation service mainly focuses on achieving an accurate and full drug history. This will achieve the best
treatment plan and reduce medication discrepancies.
Upon the recent implementation of clinical pharmacy services in the emergency department at Alexandria Main
University Hospital, medication reconciliation was one of the most important duties that needed to be focused on.
We hypothesized that clinical pharmacists are able to achieve patients’ drug history lists with higher accuracy
than emergency physicians.
Results A total number of 161 patients were included. Age was 58.59±(13.78) years, number of comorbidities
was 2.39±(1.22) and number of home medications was 4.51±(2.72). Clinical pharmacists’ fulfillment of patients’
drug history was significantly more accurate than the emergency physicians (75.16% and 50.3% of the total number
of revised patients’ profiles respectively). The clinical pharmacists could put a written copy of the accurate patients’
drug history list in only 50.93% of the revised patients’ profiles. Five hundred eighty-five medication discrepan-
cies were detected which represent an average of 3.63 discrepancies/medication sheet. Medications at Transitions
and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) Toolkit for medication reconciliation and the National Coordinating Council for Medica-
tion Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) index were used to categorize discrepancies. Categories A, B, and C
represented (66.5%), while categories D, E, and F represented (33.5%) of the total discrepancies. There was a significant
direct relationship between the total number of discrepancies and both the number of comorbidities and the num-
ber of drugs administered before hospital admission.
Conclusion The clinical pharmacists are the main members of the emergency health care team. One of their funda-
mental services is medication reconciliation. The establishment of a complete drug history list and physicians’ discus-
sion about the current treatment plan can obviously detect and reduce medication errors.
Creator
Heba Othman Shaker1* , Ahmed Abdel Fattah Sabry1
, Asmaa Salah1
, Gilan Mohamed Ragab1
,
Nahla Ahmed Sedik1
, Zahraa Ali1
, Doha Magdy1 and Asmaa Mohamed Alkafafy1
, Asmaa Salah1
, Gilan Mohamed Ragab1
,
Nahla Ahmed Sedik1
, Zahraa Ali1
, Doha Magdy1 and Asmaa Mohamed Alkafafy1
Source
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00568-z
Date
2023
Contributor
Peri Irawan
Format
pdf
Language
english
Type
text
Files
Collection
Citation
Heba Othman Shaker1* , Ahmed Abdel Fattah Sabry1
, Asmaa Salah1
, Gilan Mohamed Ragab1
,
Nahla Ahmed Sedik1
, Zahraa Ali1
, Doha Magdy1 and Asmaa Mohamed Alkafafy1, “The impact of clinical pharmacists’ medication reconciliation upon patients’ admission to reduce medication discrepancies in the emergency department: a prospective quasi‐interventional study,” Repository Horizon University Indonesia, accessed April 13, 2026, https://repository.horizon.ac.id/items/show/12240.