Comparison of two electronic medical record-
based frailty assessment tools and their
association with adverse outcomes in older
hospitalized patients with urgent admissions
Dublin Core
Title
Comparison of two electronic medical record-
based frailty assessment tools and their
association with adverse outcomes in older
hospitalized patients with urgent admissions
based frailty assessment tools and their
association with adverse outcomes in older
hospitalized patients with urgent admissions
Subject
Canadian Institute for Health Information-Hospital Frailty Risk Measure, United Kingdom-Hospital Frailty
Risk Score, Urgent admission, Older, Adverse outcome
Risk Score, Urgent admission, Older, Adverse outcome
Description
Frailty assessment is crucial for predicting outcomes in acute care settings; however, its application
remains challenging. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and compare two electronic medical record-based tools—
the Canadian Institute for Health Information Hospital Frailty Risk Measure (CIHI-HFRM) and the United Kingdom
Hospital Frailty Risk Score (UK-HFRS)—in older patients requiring urgent admission.
Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 35,564 patients aged 65 or older from the MIMIC-IV 2.0
database. Frailty was assessed using CIHI-HFRM and UK-HFRS. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, one-
year post-discharge mortality, post-discharge care needs, timely hospital discharge, and one-year readmission rates.
Logistic regression, Cox regression, and competing risk models were used for analysis.
Results The CIHI-HFRM and UK-HFRS were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) per
point: CIHI-HFRM 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.13); UK-HFRS 1.06 (95% CI 1.05–1.07)] and one-year post-
discharge mortality [hazard ratio (HR) per point: CIHI-HFRM 1.08 (95% CI 1.06–1.09); UK-HFRS 1.05 (95% CI 1.04–1.05)].
Both measures were associated with prolonged hospital stays and post-discharge care needs, while only CIHI-HFRM
was linked to one-year readmission risk.
Conclusion The CIHI-HFRM and UK-HFRS effectively stratify adverse outcomes risk in older patients requiring urgent
admission. They may be considered alongside traditional measures as part of a pragmatic multimodal pathway, which
represents a potential direction for clinical application.
Keywords Canadian Institute for Health Information-Hospital Frailty Risk Measure, United Kingdom-Hospital Frailty
Risk Score, Urgent admission, Older, Adverse outcome
remains challenging. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and compare two electronic medical record-based tools—
the Canadian Institute for Health Information Hospital Frailty Risk Measure (CIHI-HFRM) and the United Kingdom
Hospital Frailty Risk Score (UK-HFRS)—in older patients requiring urgent admission.
Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 35,564 patients aged 65 or older from the MIMIC-IV 2.0
database. Frailty was assessed using CIHI-HFRM and UK-HFRS. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, one-
year post-discharge mortality, post-discharge care needs, timely hospital discharge, and one-year readmission rates.
Logistic regression, Cox regression, and competing risk models were used for analysis.
Results The CIHI-HFRM and UK-HFRS were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) per
point: CIHI-HFRM 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.13); UK-HFRS 1.06 (95% CI 1.05–1.07)] and one-year post-
discharge mortality [hazard ratio (HR) per point: CIHI-HFRM 1.08 (95% CI 1.06–1.09); UK-HFRS 1.05 (95% CI 1.04–1.05)].
Both measures were associated with prolonged hospital stays and post-discharge care needs, while only CIHI-HFRM
was linked to one-year readmission risk.
Conclusion The CIHI-HFRM and UK-HFRS effectively stratify adverse outcomes risk in older patients requiring urgent
admission. They may be considered alongside traditional measures as part of a pragmatic multimodal pathway, which
represents a potential direction for clinical application.
Keywords Canadian Institute for Health Information-Hospital Frailty Risk Measure, United Kingdom-Hospital Frailty
Risk Score, Urgent admission, Older, Adverse outcome
Creator
Benchuan Hao1†, Yifei Xu2†, Huimin Yang3†, Liangchen Li4
, Zhong Zhang1
, Huihui Xia1
, Dapeng Song1
,
Chaosheng Du1
, Zhenzhen Yang1
and Bei Zhao1*
, Zhong Zhang1
, Huihui Xia1
, Dapeng Song1
,
Chaosheng Du1
, Zhenzhen Yang1
and Bei Zhao1*
Source
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-025-01061-5
Date
2026
Contributor
peri irawan
Format
pdf
Language
english
Type
text
Files
Collection
Citation
Benchuan Hao1†, Yifei Xu2†, Huimin Yang3†, Liangchen Li4
, Zhong Zhang1
, Huihui Xia1
, Dapeng Song1
,
Chaosheng Du1
, Zhenzhen Yang1
and Bei Zhao1*, “Comparison of two electronic medical record-
based frailty assessment tools and their
association with adverse outcomes in older
hospitalized patients with urgent admissions,” Repository Horizon University Indonesia, accessed April 26, 2026, https://repository.horizon.ac.id/items/show/12940.
based frailty assessment tools and their
association with adverse outcomes in older
hospitalized patients with urgent admissions,” Repository Horizon University Indonesia, accessed April 26, 2026, https://repository.horizon.ac.id/items/show/12940.