Jurnal Internasional Afrika vol. 13 issue 3 2023
African Journal of Emergency Medicine
A 12-month retrospective descriptive analysis of a single helicopter emergency medical service operator in four South African provinces

Jurnal Internasional Afrika vol. 13 issue 3 2023
African Journal of Emergency Medicine
A 12-month retrospective descriptive analysis of a single helicopter emergency medical service operator in four South African provinces

Helicopter emergency medical service Critical care transport Emergency care systems Trauma Interfacility transport

Introduction: Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) is integrated into modern emergency medical services because of its suggested mortality benefit in certain patient populations, it is an expensive resource and appropriate use/feasibility in low- to middle income countries (LMIC) is highly debated. To maximise benefit, correct patient selection in HEMS is paramount. To achieve this, current practices first need to be described. The study aims to describe a population of patients utilising HEMS in South Africa, in terms of flight data, patient demographics, provisional diagnosis, as well as clinical characteristics and interventions. Methods: A retrospective flight- and patient-chart review were conducted, extracting clinical and mission data of a single aeromedical operator in South Africa, over a 12-month period (July 2017 –June 2018) in Gauteng, Free State, Mpumalanga and North-West provinces. Results: A total of 916 cases were included (203 primary cases, 713 interfacility transport (IFT) cases). Most patients transported were male (n = 548, 59.8%) and suffered blunt trauma (n = 379, 41.4%). Medical pathol- ogy (n = 247, 27%) and neonatal transfers (n = 184, 20.1%) follows. Flights occurred mainly in daylight hours (n = 729, 79.6%) with median mission times of 1-hour 53 minutes (primary missions), and 3 hours 10 minutes (IFT missions). Median on-scene times were 26 minutes (primary missions) and 55 minutes (IFT missions). Almost half were transported with an endotracheal tube (n = 428, 46.7%), with a large number receiving no respiratory support (n = 414, 45.2%). No patients received fibrinolysis, defibrillation, cardioversion or cardiac pacing. Intra- venous fluid therapy (n = 867, 94.7%) was almost universal, with common administration of sedation (n = 430, 46.9%) and analgesia (n = 329, 35.9%). Conclusion: Apart from the lack of universal call-out criteria and response to the high burden of trauma, HEMS seem to fulfil an important critical care transport role. It seems that cardiac pathologies are under-represented in this study and might have an important implication for crew training requirements

Neville Vlok, Craig Wylie , Willem Stassen

www.elsevier.com/locate/afjem

elsevier

14 May 2023

peri irawan

pdf

english

text