Safety and Health at Work Vol. 13 Issue 4 2022
Fatigue Risk Management Systems Diagnostic Tool: Validation of an Organizational Assessment Tool for Shift Work Organizations (Original article)
Dublin Core
Title
Safety and Health at Work Vol. 13 Issue 4 2022
Fatigue Risk Management Systems Diagnostic Tool: Validation of an Organizational Assessment Tool for Shift Work Organizations (Original article)
Fatigue Risk Management Systems Diagnostic Tool: Validation of an Organizational Assessment Tool for Shift Work Organizations (Original article)
Subject
Fatigue, Health and safety, Risk management, shiftwork
Description
Background: This study aimed to determine and define the elements of an Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) diagnostic tool to assist an organization in systematically assessing its level of implementation of an FRMS.
Methods: A modified Delphi process was used involving 16 participants with expertise in sleep science, chronobiology, and fatigue risk management within occupational settings. The study was undertaken in
two stages 1) review of elements and definitions; 2) review of statements for each element. Each stage involved an iterative process, and a consensus rule of 60% was applied to arrive at a final list of ele-
ments, definitions, and statements.
Results: Stage 1: a review of elements (n 1⁄4 12) and definitions resulted in a final list of 14 elements and definitions with a consensus of 60% achieved after 2 Delphi rounds. Stage 2: a review of statements
(n 1⁄4 131) resulted in a final list of 119 statements with a consensus of 60% achieved after 2 Delphi rounds.
Conclusion: The final FRMS diagnostic tool will enable an organization to systematically assess the level of implementation of their current FRMS and identify gaps and opportunities to reduce risk.
Methods: A modified Delphi process was used involving 16 participants with expertise in sleep science, chronobiology, and fatigue risk management within occupational settings. The study was undertaken in
two stages 1) review of elements and definitions; 2) review of statements for each element. Each stage involved an iterative process, and a consensus rule of 60% was applied to arrive at a final list of ele-
ments, definitions, and statements.
Results: Stage 1: a review of elements (n 1⁄4 12) and definitions resulted in a final list of 14 elements and definitions with a consensus of 60% achieved after 2 Delphi rounds. Stage 2: a review of statements
(n 1⁄4 131) resulted in a final list of 119 statements with a consensus of 60% achieved after 2 Delphi rounds.
Conclusion: The final FRMS diagnostic tool will enable an organization to systematically assess the level of implementation of their current FRMS and identify gaps and opportunities to reduce risk.
Creator
Gemma Maisey, Marcus Cattani, Amanda Devine, Ian C. Dunican
Publisher
Elsevier Korea LLC
Date
December 2022
Contributor
Sri Wahyuni
Format
PDF
Language
English
Type
Text
Coverage
Safety and Health at Work Vol. 13 Issue 4 2022
Files
Citation
Gemma Maisey, Marcus Cattani, Amanda Devine, Ian C. Dunican, “Safety and Health at Work Vol. 13 Issue 4 2022
Fatigue Risk Management Systems Diagnostic Tool: Validation of an Organizational Assessment Tool for Shift Work Organizations (Original article),” Repository Horizon University Indonesia, accessed November 21, 2024, https://repository.horizon.ac.id/items/show/2305.
Fatigue Risk Management Systems Diagnostic Tool: Validation of an Organizational Assessment Tool for Shift Work Organizations (Original article),” Repository Horizon University Indonesia, accessed November 21, 2024, https://repository.horizon.ac.id/items/show/2305.