Liking versus commenting on online news: effects of
expression affordances on political attitudes

Dublin Core

Title

Liking versus commenting on online news: effects of
expression affordances on political attitudes

Subject

political expression, technological affordance, TIME theory, attitude extremity, affective polarization, news comments

Description

By performing actions such as “liking” a post, commenting on it, or sharing it with others, we are constantly expressing our opinions about ongo-
ing news and public affairs on online media platforms. How do these acts of expression affect our feelings and opinions? We address this ques-
tion from an “affordance” perspective, focusing on the effects of both the presence of the expression affordance (cue effects) and users’ actual

engagement with it (action effects). We conducted an online experiment (N 1⁄4 368) on a news website with thumbs-up/down and/or commenting
as low-effort and high-effort expression affordances, respectively. Data revealed that the low-effort affordance led to more affective polarization
while the high-effort affordance promoted increased interest in deliberation. Merely presenting a commenting cue mitigated affective polarization
by increasing perceived interactivity. However, when users engaged the affordance by providing comments, it tended to reinforce pre-existing
opinions. These findings have theoretical and practical implications.

Creator

Jinping Wang, S. Shyam Sundar

Source

https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac018

Date

1 August 2022

Contributor

PERI IRAWAN

Format

PDF

Language

ENGLISH

Type

TEXT

Files

Collection

Citation

Jinping Wang, S. Shyam Sundar, “Liking versus commenting on online news: effects of
expression affordances on political attitudes,” Repository Horizon University Indonesia, accessed May 20, 2025, https://repository.horizon.ac.id/items/show/8640.